The result

Sense and Tezi tie at 58.

Sense and Tezi, both in the Screening cohort, tie at 58 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Sense leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Tezi 2, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Tezi takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Sense 72, Tezi 83), which is 73% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Customer Documentation, Sense 62 to Tezi 50.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Sense4
  • Tezi2
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Customer Documentation62 vs 50
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Sense and Tezi are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Scheduling and Sourcing.

RecordSenseTezi
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20162024

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight34% of the movement so far

    Sense72
    Tezi83

    2.0 weighted points to Tezi

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight61% of the movement so far

    Sense60
    Tezi52

    1.6 weighted points to Sense

  3. Customer Documentation

    8% weight78% of the movement so far

    Sense62
    Tezi50

    1.0 weighted points to Sense

  4. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight90% of the movement so far

    Sense52
    Tezi58

    0.7 weighted points to Tezi

  5. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight98% of the movement so far

    Sense58
    Tezi55

    0.4 weighted points to Sense

  6. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight100% of the movement so far

    Sense64
    Tezi63

    0.1 weighted points to Sense

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.4.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Sense minus Tezi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightSenseTeziΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6052+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%7283-11-2.0
FRIA Support15%3838--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6463+1+0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%5258-6-0.7
Customer Documentation8%6250+12+1.0
Total100%58F58F-+0.4

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSenseTezi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on a separate domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20—
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%163Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain113Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sense and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Sense last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tezi last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next