HomeCompareSHL vs VidCruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SHL vs VidCruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

3 points separate SHL and VidCruiter.

SHL (Assessment) edges VidCruiter (Video interview) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 51 to 48. SHL leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while VidCruiter leads 2, including Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — SHL 50, VidCruiter 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage SHL holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SHL is filed under Assessment AI, VidCruiter under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSHLVidCruiter
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersGBCA
Founded19772012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SHL 50 · VidCruiter 38

    2.2 weighted points to SHL

  2. 12% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SHL 40 · VidCruiter 33

    0.8 weighted points to SHL

  3. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SHL 58 · VidCruiter 62

    0.5 weighted points to VidCruiter

  4. 20% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SHL 60 · VidCruiter 58

    0.4 weighted points to SHL

  5. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SHL 30 · VidCruiter 32

    0.3 weighted points to VidCruiter

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SHL 58 · VidCruiter 56

    0.3 weighted points to SHL

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SHL minus VidCruiter.

CategoryWeightSHLVidCruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6058+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5038+12+2.2
FRIA Support15%3032-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5856+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5862-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4033+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%51 (F)48 (F)+3+2.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSHLVidCruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%154Sources on the vendor's own domain126Sources on the vendor's own domain

SHL has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; VidCruiter has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for SHL, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for VidCruiter, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
SHL last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
VidCruiter last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.