HomeCompareSmartRecruiters vs Textkernel

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SmartRecruiters vs Textkernel

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Textkernel on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters sits 11 points above Textkernel under rubric v1.0 — 62 (D) against 51 (F) — with SmartRecruiters filed under ATS-integrated and Textkernel under Sourcing. SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria, Textkernel none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, SmartRecruiters 63 to Textkernel 62. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (SmartRecruiters 78, Textkernel 55, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SmartRecruiters is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Textkernel under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordSmartRecruitersTextkernel
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20102001

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SmartRecruiters 78 · Textkernel 55

    4.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SmartRecruiters 70 · Textkernel 55

    3.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SmartRecruiters 45 · Textkernel 32

    1.9 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SmartRecruiters 62 · Textkernel 55

    1.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SmartRecruiters 48 · Textkernel 40

    1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SmartRecruiters 62 · Textkernel 60

    0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SmartRecruiters 63 · Textkernel 62

    0.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SmartRecruiters minus Textkernel.

CategoryWeightSmartRecruitersTextkernelΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7055+15+3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7855+23+4.1
FRIA Support15%4532+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6260+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4840+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%6362+1+0.1
Total100%62 (D)51 (F)+11+11.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSmartRecruitersTextkernel
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%10Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain135Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Textkernel has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Textkernel, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Textkernel last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.