HomeCompareSmartRecruiters vs Vervoe

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SmartRecruiters vs Vervoe

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Vervoe on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters finishes 16 points clear of Vervoe under rubric v1.0 — 62 (D) against 46 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Vervoe leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (SmartRecruiters 78, Vervoe 52) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (SmartRecruiters 70, Vervoe 45), the second being 30% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SmartRecruiters is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Vervoe under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Vervoe is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSmartRecruitersVervoe
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded20102016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SmartRecruiters 70 · Vervoe 45

    5.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SmartRecruiters 78 · Vervoe 52

    4.7 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SmartRecruiters 45 · Vervoe 25

    3.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SmartRecruiters 48 · Vervoe 28

    2.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SmartRecruiters 62 · Vervoe 55

    1.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SmartRecruiters 63 · Vervoe 58

    0.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SmartRecruiters 62 · Vervoe 60

    0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SmartRecruiters minus Vervoe.

CategoryWeightSmartRecruitersVervoeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7045+25+5.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7852+26+4.7
FRIA Support15%4525+20+3.0
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6260+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4828+20+2.4
Customer Documentation8%6358+5+0.4
Total100%62 (D)46 (F)+16+16.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSmartRecruitersVervoe
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%10Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Vervoe last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.