HomeCompareSova Assessment vs Tribepad

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Sova Assessment vs Tribepad

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tribepad leads Sova Assessment by 8 points.

Tribepad scores 56 and Sova Assessment 48 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Tribepad: Tribepad is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Sova Assessment on FRIA Support. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Sova Assessment 38, Tribepad 78) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 72% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Sova Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Sova Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSova AssessmentTribepad
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersGBGB
Founded20152008

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Sova Assessment 38 · Tribepad 78

    7.2 weighted points to Tribepad

  2. 12% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Sova Assessment 40 · Tribepad 54

    1.7 weighted points to Tribepad

  3. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Sova Assessment 40 · Tribepad 30

    1.5 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  4. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Sova Assessment 52 · Tribepad 56

    0.6 weighted points to Tribepad

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Sova Assessment 55 · Tribepad 58

    0.4 weighted points to Tribepad

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Sova Assessment 62 · Tribepad 58

    0.3 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  7. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Sova Assessment 55 · Tribepad 56

    0.2 weighted points to Tribepad

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Sova Assessment minus Tribepad.

CategoryWeightSova AssessmentTribepadΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5556-1-0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%3878-40-7.2
FRIA Support15%4030+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5256-4-0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4054-14-1.7
Customer Documentation8%6258+4+0.3
Total100%48 (F)56 (F)-8-8.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSova AssessmentTribepad
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%42Sources on the vendor's own domain40Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%288Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain284Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Sova Assessment has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sova Assessment and Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Sova Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Sova Assessment last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tribepad last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.