HomeCompareStepstone vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Stepstone vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Stepstone leads Talview on all 7 criteria.

Stepstone scores 49 and Talview 42 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Screening and Video interview cohorts. Stepstone is ahead of Talview on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at Stepstone 58 to Talview 55. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Stepstone 50, Talview 38, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Stepstone holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Stepstone is filed under Screening AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Talview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordStepstoneTalview
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded19962012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 33% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Stepstone 50 · Talview 38

    2.2 weighted points to Stepstone

  2. 15% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Stepstone 55 · Talview 48

    1.1 weighted points to Stepstone

  3. 20% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Stepstone 55 · Talview 50

    1.0 weighted points to Stepstone

  4. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Stepstone 30 · Talview 25

    0.8 weighted points to Stepstone

  5. 12% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Stepstone 38 · Talview 32

    0.7 weighted points to Stepstone

  6. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Stepstone 58 · Talview 52

    0.5 weighted points to Stepstone

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Stepstone 58 · Talview 55

    0.4 weighted points to Stepstone

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Stepstone minus Talview.

CategoryWeightStepstoneTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5550+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5038+12+2.2
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5548+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3832+6+0.7
Customer Documentation8%5852+6+0.5
Total100%49 (F)42 (F)+7+6.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightStepstoneTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%50Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%294Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Stepstone has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Stepstone sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Stepstone, across 6 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Stepstone last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.