HomeCompareTalview vs Zappyhire

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Talview vs Zappyhire

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Talview leads Zappyhire on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Talview scores 42 and Zappyhire 34 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Video interview and Screening cohorts. Talview leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Zappyhire is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Talview leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Talview 32 to Zappyhire 28. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Talview 50, Zappyhire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 48% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Talview is filed under Video interview AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordTalviewZappyhire
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20122018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Talview 50 · Zappyhire 30

    4.0 weighted points to Talview

  2. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Talview 38 · Zappyhire 28

    1.8 weighted points to Talview

  3. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Talview 48 · Zappyhire 42

    0.9 weighted points to Talview

  4. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Talview 55 · Zappyhire 50

    0.6 weighted points to Talview

  5. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Talview 52 · Zappyhire 45

    0.6 weighted points to Talview

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Talview 32 · Zappyhire 28

    0.5 weighted points to Talview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Talview minus Zappyhire.

CategoryWeightTalviewZappyhireΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5030+20+4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3828+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4842+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5550+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3228+4+0.5
Customer Documentation8%5245+7+0.6
Total100%42 (F)34 (F)+8+8.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightTalviewZappyhire
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1121Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%116Sources on the vendor's own domain126Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zappyhire last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.