§ The result
Teamtailor leads Toggl Hire on all 7 criteria.
Teamtailor sits 10 points above Toggl Hire under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 37 — with Teamtailor filed under ATS-integrated and Toggl Hire under Assessment. Teamtailor leads every one of the 7 criteria, Toggl Hire none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Teamtailor 54 to Toggl Hire 52. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Teamtailor 50, Toggl Hire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Teamtailor holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
Teamtailor is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Teamtailor | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | SE | EE |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Teamtailor 50 · Toggl Hire 30
4.0 weighted points to Teamtailor
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Teamtailor 30 · Toggl Hire 20
1.8 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Teamtailor 42 · Toggl Hire 30
1.8 weighted points to Teamtailor
8% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Teamtailor 62 · Toggl Hire 50
1.0 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Teamtailor 42 · Toggl Hire 35
0.8 weighted points to Teamtailor
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Teamtailor 58 · Toggl Hire 55
0.4 weighted points to Teamtailor
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Teamtailor 54 · Toggl Hire 52
0.2 weighted points to Teamtailor
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Teamtailor minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | Teamtailor | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 30 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 20 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 37 (F) | +10 | +10.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Teamtailor | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Teamtailor has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Teamtailor, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Teamtailor last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next