§ The result
Tezi leads TestDome by 21 points.
Tezi finishes 21 points clear of TestDome under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 37 — across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. Tezi leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while TestDome leads 1, including Customer Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (TestDome 15, Tezi 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 57% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
TestDome is filed under Assessment AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only TestDome is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | TestDome | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | HR | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
TestDome 15 · Tezi 83
12.2 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
TestDome 30 · Tezi 58
3.4 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
TestDome 40 · Tezi 52
2.4 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
TestDome 28 · Tezi 38
1.5 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
TestDome 52 · Tezi 63
1.3 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
TestDome 60 · Tezi 50
0.8 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
TestDome 50 · Tezi 55
0.8 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is TestDome minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | TestDome | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 83 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 63 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 58 | -28 | -3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 58 (F) | -21 | -20.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | TestDome | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next