§ The result
Tribepad leads Vervoe by 10 points.
Tribepad, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 10 points above Vervoe, filed under Assessment: 56 against 46 under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Tribepad, with 1 level: Tribepad is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Vervoe on Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Tribepad 78, Vervoe 52 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
Vendor profile
Vervoe
AI-powered skills-assessment platform that grades and ranks candidates on performance in role-specific, task-based assessments.
§ The record
Tribepad is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Vervoe under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Vervoe is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Tribepad | Vervoe |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | AU |
| Founded | 2008 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Tribepad 78 · Vervoe 52
4.7 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Tribepad 54 · Vervoe 28
3.1 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Tribepad 56 · Vervoe 45
2.2 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Tribepad 30 · Vervoe 25
0.8 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Tribepad 58 · Vervoe 60
0.2 weighted points to Vervoe
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Tribepad 56 · Vervoe 55
0.1 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Tribepad minus Vervoe.
| Category | Weight | Tribepad | Vervoe | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 56 | 45 | +11 | +2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 78 | 52 | +26 | +4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 54 | 28 | +26 | +3.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 46 (F) | +10 | +10.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Tribepad | Vervoe | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Vervoe last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next