§ The result
Tribepad and Workday Recruiting AI tie at 56.
Tribepad and Workday Recruiting AI, both in the ATS-integrated cohort, tie at 56 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Tribepad leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Workday Recruiting AI 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. Tribepad takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Tribepad 78, Workday Recruiting AI 60), which is 57% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, Tribepad 54 to Workday Recruiting AI 35.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Tribepad and Workday Recruiting AI are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Tribepad is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Tribepad | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2008 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Tribepad 78 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
3.2 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Tribepad 56 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
2.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Tribepad 54 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
2.3 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Tribepad 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Tribepad 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Tribepad 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Tribepad 56 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.1 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Tribepad minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Tribepad | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 56 | 70 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 78 | 60 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 54 | 35 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 56 (F) | - | +0.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Tribepad | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next