§ The result
VidCruiter leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
VidCruiter sits 12 points above Turing under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 36 — with VidCruiter filed under Video interview and Turing under Assessment. VidCruiter is ahead of Turing on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Post-Market Monitoring at Turing 27 to VidCruiter 33. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Turing 45, VidCruiter 62) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Turing 42, VidCruiter 58), the second being 28% of the weighted advantage VidCruiter holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
Vendor profile
VidCruiter
VidCruiter is an enterprise recruitment platform combining live and pre-recorded video interviewing, structured interview workflows, automated scheduling, skills testing, automated reference checks, and AI features such as transcript-based AI Interview Scoring, AI Interview Notes, and AI fraud detection.
§ The record
Turing is filed under Assessment AI, VidCruiter under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Turing | VidCruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Turing 42 · VidCruiter 58
3.2 weighted points to VidCruiter
12% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Turing 45 · VidCruiter 62
2.0 weighted points to VidCruiter
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Turing 28 · VidCruiter 38
1.8 weighted points to VidCruiter
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Turing 44 · VidCruiter 56
1.8 weighted points to VidCruiter
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Turing 25 · VidCruiter 32
1.1 weighted points to VidCruiter
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Turing 48 · VidCruiter 60
1.0 weighted points to VidCruiter
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Turing 27 · VidCruiter 33
0.7 weighted points to VidCruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Turing minus VidCruiter.
| Category | Weight | Turing | VidCruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 32 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 56 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 27 | 33 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 48 (F) | -12 | -11.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Turing | VidCruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; VidCruiter has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for VidCruiter, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- VidCruiter last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next