§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 20 points clear of Turing under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 36 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Turing leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Turing 28, Workday Recruiting AI 60, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Turing is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Turing is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Turing | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Turing 28 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
5.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Turing 42 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
5.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Turing 45 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
2.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Turing 44 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
1.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Turing 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Turing 48 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Turing 27 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Turing minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Turing | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 70 | -28 | -5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 60 | -32 | -5.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 65 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 27 | 35 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 65 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 56 (F) | -20 | -19.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Turing | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 25 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next