§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads VidCruiter by 8 points.
Workday Recruiting AI scores 56 and VidCruiter 48 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while VidCruiter leads 1, including Data Governance Disclosure. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — VidCruiter 38, Workday Recruiting AI 60 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
VidCruiter
VidCruiter is an enterprise recruitment platform combining live and pre-recorded video interviewing, structured interview workflows, automated scheduling, skills testing, automated reference checks, and AI features such as transcript-based AI Interview Scoring, AI Interview Notes, and AI fraud detection.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
VidCruiter is filed under Video interview AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only VidCruiter is in scope of Mobley v. Workday and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | VidCruiter | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
VidCruiter 38 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
4.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
VidCruiter 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
2.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
VidCruiter 32 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
VidCruiter 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
VidCruiter 62 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
VidCruiter 33 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
VidCruiter 56 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.1 weighted points to VidCruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is VidCruiter minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | VidCruiter | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 70 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 65 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 56 (F) | -8 | -7.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | VidCruiter | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
VidCruiter has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for VidCruiter, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- VidCruiter last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.