§ The result
X0PA AI leads XOR on all 7 criteria.
X0PA AI finishes 18 points clear of XOR under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 30 — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. X0PA AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, XOR none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, X0PA AI 40 to XOR 33. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (X0PA AI 50, XOR 20, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage X0PA AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
Vendor profile
XOR
XOR is a text-first conversational-AI recruiting platform that pre-screens and scores high-volume and hourly candidates with recruiter-defined knockout/scoring questions over SMS, WhatsApp, and Messenger, then auto-schedules interviews on the recruiter's calendar.
§ The record
X0PA AI is filed under Assessment AI, XOR under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only X0PA AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | X0PA AI | XOR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
X0PA AI 50 · XOR 20
6.0 weighted points to X0PA AI
18% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
X0PA AI 44 · XOR 18
4.7 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
X0PA AI 56 · XOR 42
2.1 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
X0PA AI 57 · XOR 40
2.0 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
X0PA AI 38 · XOR 25
1.9 weighted points to X0PA AI
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
X0PA AI 60 · XOR 48
1.0 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
X0PA AI 40 · XOR 33
0.8 weighted points to X0PA AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +18.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +18.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is X0PA AI minus XOR.
| Category | Weight | X0PA AI | XOR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 20 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 18 | +26 | +4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 42 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 40 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 30 (F) | +18 | +18.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | X0PA AI | XOR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; XOR has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for XOR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- XOR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next