Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
365Talents vs Darwinbox
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Darwinbox
Darwinbox is an enterprise HCM suite whose recruitment module uses Darwinbox Sense AI (now sold inside its Cortex agent platform) to parse resumes, stack-rank and recommend candidates with stated fit reasoning, run screening and shortlisting agents, and give candidates an assistant for job matching, interview details and FAQs.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
365Talents and Darwinbox tie at 46.
365Talents (Sourcing) and Darwinbox (ATS-integrated) tie at 46 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. 365Talents leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Darwinbox 1, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (365Talents 18, Darwinbox 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 100% of the weighted advantage Darwinbox holds across the 1 criterion it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- 365Talents4
- Darwinbox1
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency18 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Darwinbox under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only 365Talents is in scope of
| Record | 365Talents | Darwinbox |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | FR | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight40% of the movement so far
365Talents18Darwinbox281.8 weighted points to Darwinbox
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight64% of the movement so far
365Talents44Darwinbox351.1 weighted points to 365Talents
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight81% of the movement so far
365Talents35Darwinbox300.8 weighted points to 365Talents
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight95% of the movement so far
365Talents63Darwinbox600.6 weighted points to 365Talents
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
365Talents57Darwinbox550.2 weighted points to 365Talents
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +0.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Darwinbox, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Darwinbox | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 60 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 28 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 35 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 57 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 46F | - | +0.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Darwinbox | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Darwinbox has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Darwinbox, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Darwinbox last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.