HomeCompare365Talents vs Jobma

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

365Talents vs Jobma

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Jobma and 365Talents.

Jobma holds a 3-point edge over 365Talents under rubric v1.0, 49 to 46, across the Video interview and Sourcing cohorts. 365Talents takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 3 for Jobma, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — 365Talents 18, Jobma 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 84% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Jobma under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

Record365TalentsJobma
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersFRUS
Founded20152012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    365Talents 18 · Jobma 40

    4.0 weighted points to Jobma

  2. 20% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    365Talents 63 · Jobma 55

    1.6 weighted points to 365Talents

  3. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    365Talents 57 · Jobma 62

    0.4 weighted points to Jobma

  4. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    365Talents 57 · Jobma 60

    0.4 weighted points to Jobma

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    365Talents 58 · Jobma 56

    0.3 weighted points to 365Talents

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -2.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is 365Talents minus Jobma.

CategoryWeight365TalentsJobmaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6355+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%1840-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5856+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5760-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4444--
Customer Documentation8%5762-5-0.4
Total100%46 (F)49 (F)-3-2.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeight365TalentsJobma
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%317Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain174Sources on the vendor's own domain

365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
365Talents last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobma last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.