§ The result
Beamery leads Adaface on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Beamery (Sourcing) opens a 22-point lead on Adaface (Assessment), 61 (D) to 39 (F). Adaface is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Beamery takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Customer Documentation, Adaface 58 to Beamery 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Adaface 22, Beamery 85 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Adaface
Adaface runs chatbot-led 'conversational' skills tests for 500+ roles that score candidates automatically as pass, borderline pass or fail on benchmarked scorecards, backed by webcam, screen and IP proctoring and an AI résumé parser.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
§ The record
Adaface is filed under Assessment AI, Beamery under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Adaface is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Adaface | Beamery |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SG | GB |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Adaface 22 · Beamery 85
11.3 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Adaface 38 · Beamery 70
6.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Adaface 38 · Beamery 60
2.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Adaface 52 · Beamery 60
1.2 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Adaface 50 · Beamery 55
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Adaface 58 · Beamery 60
0.2 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -22.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -22.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Adaface minus Beamery.
| Category | Weight | Adaface | Beamery | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 70 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 85 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 61 (D) | -22 | -22.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Adaface | Beamery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Adaface has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Adaface, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Adaface last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next