Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Adaface vs Workstream
Adaface
Adaface runs chatbot-led 'conversational' skills tests for 500+ roles that score candidates automatically as pass, borderline pass or fail on benchmarked scorecards, backed by webcam, screen and IP proctoring and an AI résumé parser.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Workstream
Workstream is a mobile-first HR, payroll and hiring platform for hourly, multi-location employers such as QSR franchisees. Its hiring suite pairs a text-to-apply applicant tracking system with VoiceAI phone screens and VideoAI asynchronous video interviews, which return transcripts, AI summaries, pass/fail results for each question and match scores.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Adaface and Workstream tie at 39.
Adaface, filed under Assessment, and Workstream, filed under Screening, tie at 39 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Adaface leads 5 of the 7 criteria and Workstream 2, yet the two totals land on the same number. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Adaface 50, Workstream 61 — and at a 12% weight it carries 77% of the weighted advantage Workstream holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Adaface5
- Workstream2
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design50 vs 61
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Adaface is filed under Assessment AI, Workstream under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Adaface | Workstream |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight35% of the movement so far
Adaface50Workstream611.3 weighted points to Workstream
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight54% of the movement so far
Adaface52Workstream470.8 weighted points to Adaface
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight66% of the movement so far
Adaface30Workstream270.4 weighted points to Adaface
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight77% of the movement so far
Adaface38Workstream400.4 weighted points to Workstream
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight86% of the movement so far
Adaface22Workstream200.4 weighted points to Adaface
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Adaface38Workstream350.4 weighted points to Adaface
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Adaface58Workstream560.2 weighted points to Adaface
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Adaface minus Workstream, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Adaface | Workstream | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 27 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 47 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 61 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 56 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 39F | 39F | - | +0.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Adaface | Workstream | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Adaface has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Adaface, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Adaface last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workstream last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.