§ The result
ADP leads AmazingHiring by 11 points.
ADP sits 11 points above AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 37 — with ADP filed under ATS-integrated and AmazingHiring under Sourcing. ADP leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while AmazingHiring leads 1, including FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (ADP 46, AmazingHiring 22, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage ADP holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
ADP
ADP is an enterprise human capital management and payroll provider whose recruiting suite uses AI to parse, rank, and match job applicants via its Candidate Relevancy tool, ADP Assist generative-AI assistant/job-description generator, and skills intelligence.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
§ The record
ADP is filed under ATS-integrated AI, AmazingHiring under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only ADP is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | ADP | AmazingHiring |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1949 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ADP 46 · AmazingHiring 22
4.3 weighted points to ADP
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ADP 53 · AmazingHiring 35
3.6 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ADP 45 · AmazingHiring 33
1.4 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ADP 57 · AmazingHiring 50
1.1 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ADP 55 · AmazingHiring 48
0.8 weighted points to ADP
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ADP 58 · AmazingHiring 52
0.5 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ADP 28 · AmazingHiring 30
0.3 weighted points to AmazingHiring
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ADP minus AmazingHiring.
| Category | Weight | ADP | AmazingHiring | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 53 | 35 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 46 | 22 | +24 | +4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 50 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 33 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 37 (F) | +11 | +11.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ADP | AmazingHiring | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ADP last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next