§ The result
ADP leads Arya by Leoforce on all 7 criteria.
ADP, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 10 points above Arya by Leoforce, filed under Sourcing: 48 against 38 under rubric v1.0. ADP takes all 7 criteria and Arya by Leoforce none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, ADP 55 to Arya by Leoforce 54. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ADP 53, Arya by Leoforce 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage ADP holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
ADP
ADP is an enterprise human capital management and payroll provider whose recruiting suite uses AI to parse, rank, and match job applicants via its Candidate Relevancy tool, ADP Assist generative-AI assistant/job-description generator, and skills intelligence.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
§ The record
ADP is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Arya by Leoforce under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | ADP | Arya by Leoforce |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1949 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ADP 53 · Arya by Leoforce 30
4.6 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ADP 45 · Arya by Leoforce 30
1.8 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ADP 57 · Arya by Leoforce 48
1.3 weighted points to ADP
18% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ADP 46 · Arya by Leoforce 40
1.1 weighted points to ADP
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ADP 58 · Arya by Leoforce 46
1.0 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ADP 28 · Arya by Leoforce 25
0.4 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ADP 55 · Arya by Leoforce 54
0.1 weighted points to ADP
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ADP minus Arya by Leoforce.
| Category | Weight | ADP | Arya by Leoforce | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 53 | 30 | +23 | +4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 46 | 40 | +6 | +1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 48 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 30 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 46 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 38 (F) | +10 | +10.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ADP | Arya by Leoforce | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ADP last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next