HomeCompareADP vs Jobylon

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

ADP vs Jobylon

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

ADP and Jobylon tie at 48.

ADP and Jobylon, both in the ATS-integrated cohort, tie at 48 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. ADP leads 1 of the 7 criteria and Jobylon 5, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ADP 46, Jobylon 28 — and at an 18% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage ADP holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

ADP and Jobylon are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordADPJobylon
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSSE
Founded19492011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    ADP 46 · Jobylon 28

    3.2 weighted points to ADP

  2. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    ADP 28 · Jobylon 36

    1.2 weighted points to Jobylon

  3. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    ADP 55 · Jobylon 60

    0.6 weighted points to Jobylon

  4. 20% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    ADP 53 · Jobylon 55

    0.4 weighted points to Jobylon

  5. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    ADP 58 · Jobylon 60

    0.2 weighted points to Jobylon

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    ADP 57 · Jobylon 58

    0.1 weighted points to Jobylon

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is ADP minus Jobylon.

CategoryWeightADPJobylonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5355-2-0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4628+18+3.2
FRIA Support15%2836-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5758-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5560-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4545--
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%48 (F)48 (F)-+0.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightADPJobylon
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Sources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%185Sources on the vendor's own domain285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
ADP last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.