§ The result
ADP leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
ADP sits 11 points above myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 37 — with ADP filed under ATS-integrated and myInterview under Video interview. ADP is ahead of myInterview on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at ADP 28 to myInterview 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (ADP 58, myInterview 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (ADP 53, myInterview 38), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage ADP holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
ADP
ADP is an enterprise human capital management and payroll provider whose recruiting suite uses AI to parse, rank, and match job applicants via its Candidate Relevancy tool, ADP Assist generative-AI assistant/job-description generator, and skills intelligence.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
ADP is filed under ATS-integrated AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | ADP | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 1949 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ADP 53 · myInterview 38
3.0 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ADP 57 · myInterview 42
2.3 weighted points to ADP
18% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ADP 46 · myInterview 35
2.0 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ADP 45 · myInterview 33
1.4 weighted points to ADP
8% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ADP 58 · myInterview 40
1.4 weighted points to ADP
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ADP 55 · myInterview 48
0.8 weighted points to ADP
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ADP 28 · myInterview 25
0.4 weighted points to ADP
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ADP minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | ADP | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 53 | 38 | +15 | +3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 46 | 35 | +11 | +2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 42 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 33 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 37 (F) | +11 | +11.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ADP | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ADP last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next