§ The result
PageUp leads Alooba on all 7 criteria.
PageUp (ATS-integrated) and Alooba (Assessment) are 26 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for PageUp against 38 (F) for Alooba. PageUp takes all 7 criteria and Alooba none of them; the nearest contest is Customer Documentation, Alooba 58 to PageUp 63. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Alooba 22, PageUp 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Alooba
Alooba sells online skills assessments (auto-graded SQL, Python/R, multiple-choice and data-analysis tests, plus manually graded free-response and one-way video questions) that employers use to screen, benchmark and optionally auto-reject job candidates.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Alooba is filed under Assessment AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Alooba is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Alooba | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | AU |
| Founded | 2019 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Alooba 22 · PageUp 80
10.4 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Alooba 40 · PageUp 74
6.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Alooba 45 · PageUp 63
2.7 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Alooba 36 · PageUp 55
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Alooba 28 · PageUp 40
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Alooba 55 · PageUp 64
1.1 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Alooba 58 · PageUp 63
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -26 beside that -25.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Alooba minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Alooba | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 74 | -34 | -6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 80 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 63 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 55 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 63 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 64 (D) | -26 | -25.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Alooba | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Alooba has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Alooba and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Alooba, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Alooba last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next