§ The result
Beamery leads AmazingHiring on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Beamery finishes 24 points clear of AmazingHiring inside the Sourcing cohort under rubric v1.0: 61 (D) against 37 (F). Beamery leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so AmazingHiring is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Beamery leads is Human Oversight Design, AmazingHiring 48 to Beamery 55. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — AmazingHiring 22, Beamery 85 — and at an 18% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
§ The record
AmazingHiring and Beamery are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Beamery |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2011 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Beamery 85
11.3 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Beamery 70
7.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Beamery 60
3.2 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Beamery 60
1.5 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Beamery 55
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Beamery 60
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -24.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -24.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Beamery.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Beamery | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 85 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 60 | -27 | -3.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 61 (D) | -24 | -24.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Beamery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next