§ The result
Bryq leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Bryq finishes 20 points clear of AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 37 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Bryq leads every one of the 7 criteria, AmazingHiring none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, AmazingHiring 48 to Bryq 54. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — AmazingHiring 22, Bryq 70 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Bryq under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Bryq is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Bryq |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Bryq 70
8.6 weighted points to Bryq
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Bryq 54
3.8 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Bryq 55
2.6 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Bryq 62
1.8 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Bryq 40
1.5 weighted points to Bryq
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Bryq 66
1.1 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Bryq 54
0.7 weighted points to Bryq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Bryq.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Bryq | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 54 | -19 | -3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 70 | -48 | -8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 54 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 55 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 66 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 57 (F) | -20 | -20.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Bryq | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next