§ The result
2 points separate DevSkiller and AmazingHiring.
DevSkiller (Assessment) edges AmazingHiring (Sourcing) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 39 to 37. DevSkiller leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Human Oversight Design, while AmazingHiring leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 2 are level. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (AmazingHiring 48, DevSkiller 55, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage DevSkiller holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, DevSkiller under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | DevSkiller |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | PL |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · DevSkiller 55
0.8 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · DevSkiller 40
0.8 weighted points to DevSkiller
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · DevSkiller 25
0.8 weighted points to AmazingHiring
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · DevSkiller 58
0.5 weighted points to DevSkiller
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · DevSkiller 52
0.3 weighted points to DevSkiller
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -1.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus DevSkiller.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | DevSkiller | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 22 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 39 (F) | -2 | -1.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | DevSkiller | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next