§ The result
HeyMilo leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo finishes 24 points clear of AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 37 (F) — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, AmazingHiring none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, AmazingHiring 30 to HeyMilo 42. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — AmazingHiring 22, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · HeyMilo 83
11.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · HeyMilo 58
4.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · HeyMilo 64
1.9 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · HeyMilo 42
1.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · HeyMilo 62
1.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · HeyMilo 46
1.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · HeyMilo 66
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -23.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -23.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 58 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 83 | -61 | -11.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 64 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 46 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 66 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 61 (D) | -24 | -23.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next