Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
AmazingHiring vs HiredScore
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
37
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
52
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus HiredScore.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | HiredScore | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 65 | -30 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 55 | -33 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 52 (F) | -15 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
AmazingHiring
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- public statement
- 3
- absence
- 6
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
HiredScore
9 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 6
- audit report
- 1
- absence
- 2