§ The result
1 point separates HirePro and AmazingHiring.
HirePro (Screening) edges AmazingHiring (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37. The 7 criteria split 3 to 2 in favour of HirePro, with 2 level: HirePro is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and AmazingHiring on Article 11 Technical Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (AmazingHiring 22, HirePro 33) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 65% of the weighted advantage HirePro holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HirePro under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HirePro is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | HirePro |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2011 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · HirePro 33
2.0 weighted points to HirePro
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · HirePro 30
1.0 weighted points to AmazingHiring
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · HirePro 55
0.8 weighted points to HirePro
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · HirePro 25
0.8 weighted points to AmazingHiring
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · HirePro 35
0.2 weighted points to HirePro
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus HirePro.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | HirePro | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 33 | -11 | -2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 38 (F) | -1 | -1.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | HirePro | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next