§ The result
Hogan Assessments leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Hogan Assessments sits 10 points above AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 37 — with Hogan Assessments filed under Assessment and AmazingHiring under Sourcing. Hogan Assessments leads every one of the 7 criteria, AmazingHiring none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, AmazingHiring 50 to Hogan Assessments 52. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (AmazingHiring 22, Hogan Assessments 44, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Hogan Assessments under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Hogan Assessments |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 1987 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Hogan Assessments 44
4.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Hogan Assessments 50
3.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Hogan Assessments 36
0.9 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Hogan Assessments 40
0.8 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Hogan Assessments 62
0.8 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Hogan Assessments 52
0.5 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Hogan Assessments 52
0.3 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Hogan Assessments.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Hogan Assessments | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 50 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 44 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 47 (F) | -10 | -10.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Hogan Assessments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next