§ The result
PageUp leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
PageUp (ATS-integrated) and AmazingHiring (Sourcing) are 27 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for PageUp against 37 (F) for AmazingHiring. AmazingHiring leads none of the 7 criteria, and PageUp is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (AmazingHiring 22, PageUp 80, 18% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage PageUp builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only PageUp is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2011 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · PageUp 80
10.4 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · PageUp 74
7.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · PageUp 55
2.6 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · PageUp 63
1.9 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · PageUp 64
1.9 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · PageUp 40
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · PageUp 63
0.9 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -27.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 74 | -39 | -7.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 80 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 63 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 64 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 55 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 63 | -11 | -0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 64 (D) | -27 | -27.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next