§ The result
Phenom leads AmazingHiring by 15 points.
Phenom finishes 15 points clear of AmazingHiring inside the Sourcing cohort under rubric v1.0: 52 against 37. Phenom leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while AmazingHiring leads 2, including FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — AmazingHiring 22, Phenom 75 — and at an 18% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage Phenom holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Phenom
Talent experience platform combining a career site CMS, candidate CRM, internal mobility, and conversational AI for screening and scheduling.
§ The record
AmazingHiring and Phenom are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Phenom is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Phenom |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Phenom 75
9.5 weighted points to Phenom
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Phenom 55
4.0 weighted points to Phenom
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Phenom 60
1.5 weighted points to Phenom
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Phenom 60
1.4 weighted points to Phenom
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Phenom 25
0.8 weighted points to AmazingHiring
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Phenom 30
0.4 weighted points to AmazingHiring
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Phenom 55
0.2 weighted points to Phenom
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Phenom.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Phenom | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 75 | -53 | -9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 30 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 52 (F) | -15 | -15.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Phenom | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Phenom has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 10 for Phenom, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Phenom last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next