Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
AmazingHiring vs Plum
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Plum | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 58 | -23 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 83 | -61 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 54 | -4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 36 | -3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 63 | -11 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 54 (F) | -17 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
AmazingHiring
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- public statement
- 3
- absence
- 6
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Plum
19 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 12
- audit report
- 3
- absence
- 4