§ The result
The Predictive Index leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
The Predictive Index sits 11 points above AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 37 — with The Predictive Index filed under Assessment and AmazingHiring under Sourcing. The Predictive Index leads every one of the 7 criteria, AmazingHiring none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, AmazingHiring 48 to The Predictive Index 52. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (AmazingHiring 22, The Predictive Index 45, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage The Predictive Index holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only The Predictive Index is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | The Predictive Index |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 1955 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · The Predictive Index 45
4.1 weighted points to The Predictive Index
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · The Predictive Index 50
3.0 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · The Predictive Index 43
1.2 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · The Predictive Index 35
0.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · The Predictive Index 55
0.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · The Predictive Index 60
0.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · The Predictive Index 52
0.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus The Predictive Index.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | The Predictive Index | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 50 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 45 | -23 | -4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 43 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 48 (F) | -11 | -11.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | The Predictive Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next