Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
AmazingHiring vs Radancy
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Radancy
Radancy is an enterprise talent acquisition cloud combining recruitment marketing, career sites and CRM with agentic AI that sources, screens, scores, ranks and schedules candidates, including one-way video screening inherited from its myInterview acquisition.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Radancy.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Radancy | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 42 | -7 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 58 | -8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 57 | -9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 36 | -3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 41 (F) | -4 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
AmazingHiring
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- public statement
- 3
- absence
- 6
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Radancy
22 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 1
- integration
- 1