Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
AmazingHiring vs Sapia.ai
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Sapia.ai
Structured, text-based chat interview that scores candidates on personality (HEXACO) and competency traits — with no video, audio, or demographic data used.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Sapia.ai.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Sapia.ai | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 52 | -30 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 62 | -12 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 62 | -14 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 50 | -17 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 62 | -10 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 56 (F) | -19 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
AmazingHiring
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- public statement
- 3
- absence
- 6
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Sapia.ai
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 4
- audit report
- 2