Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
AmazingHiring vs Turing
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Turing | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 42 | -7 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 28 | -6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 44 | +6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 45 | +3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 27 | +6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 48 | +4 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 36 (F) | +1 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
AmazingHiring
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- public statement
- 3
- absence
- 6
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Turing
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 6
- absence
- 7
- public statement
- 1