§ The result
3 points separate Arya by Leoforce and Aon Assessment.
Arya by Leoforce holds a 3-point edge over Aon Assessment under rubric v1.0, 38 to 35, across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Arya by Leoforce leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Aon Assessment leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Aon Assessment — Aon Assessment 40, Arya by Leoforce 30, on a 20% weight — which is 93% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Arya by Leoforce under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Arya by Leoforce |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Arya by Leoforce 30
2.0 weighted points to Aon Assessment
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Arya by Leoforce 40
1.8 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Arya by Leoforce 48
1.5 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Arya by Leoforce 54
1.1 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Arya by Leoforce 30
0.6 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Arya by Leoforce 46
0.2 weighted points to Aon Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -2.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Arya by Leoforce.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Arya by Leoforce | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 48 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 54 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 46 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 38 (F) | -3 | -2.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Arya by Leoforce | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next