Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Aon Assessment vs Eightfold AI
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Concerning
Sourcing
The result
Eightfold AI leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Eightfold AI (Sourcing) and Aon Assessment (Assessment) are 29 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for Eightfold AI against 35 (F) for Aon Assessment. Aon Assessment leads none of the 7 criteria, and Eightfold AI is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 30, Eightfold AI 85, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Aon Assessment0
- Eightfold AI7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency30 vs 85
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Eightfold AI under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Aon Assessment is in scope of
| Record | Aon Assessment | Eightfold AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2016 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight34% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment30Eightfold AI859.9 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight58% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment40Eightfold AI757.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight70% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment38Eightfold AI603.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight80% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25Eightfold AI453.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight90% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25Eightfold AI503.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment45Eightfold AI601.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment48Eightfold AI601.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -29.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 29.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -29 beside that -29.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Eightfold AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Eightfold AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 75 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 85 | -55 | -9.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 45 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 50 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 35F | 64D | -29 | -29.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Eightfold AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.