§ The result
Aon Assessment takes the total, HeroHunt.ai takes more of the criteria.
Aon Assessment scores 35 and HeroHunt.ai 30 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. HeroHunt.ai leads more of the criteria than Aon Assessment — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Aon Assessment leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Aon Assessment. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Aon Assessment 40, HeroHunt.ai 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 53% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, HeroHunt.ai under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | HeroHunt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | DE | NL |
| Founded | 2002 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · HeroHunt.ai 20
4.0 weighted points to Aon Assessment
18% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · HeroHunt.ai 10
3.6 weighted points to Aon Assessment
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · HeroHunt.ai 55
1.2 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · HeroHunt.ai 45
1.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · HeroHunt.ai 28
0.4 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · HeroHunt.ai 27
0.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus HeroHunt.ai.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | HeroHunt.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 20 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 10 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 45 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 48 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 30 (F) | +5 | +4.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | HeroHunt.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next