HomeCompareAon Assessment vs Oracle Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Aon Assessment vs Oracle Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Oracle Recruiting leads Aon Assessment on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Oracle Recruiting sits 14 points above Aon Assessment under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 35 — with Oracle Recruiting filed under ATS-integrated and Aon Assessment under Assessment. Oracle Recruiting leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Aon Assessment is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Oracle Recruiting leads is FRIA Support, Aon Assessment 25 to Oracle Recruiting 35. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (Aon Assessment 38, Oracle Recruiting 60) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Aon Assessment 40, Oracle Recruiting 60), the second being 30% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAon AssessmentOracle Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded20021977

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Aon Assessment 40 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    4.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Aon Assessment 38 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    3.3 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Aon Assessment 45 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    1.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Aon Assessment 25 · Oracle Recruiting 40

    1.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Aon Assessment 25 · Oracle Recruiting 35

    1.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Aon Assessment 48 · Oracle Recruiting 62

    1.1 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -13.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Aon Assessment minus Oracle Recruiting.

CategoryWeightAon AssessmentOracle RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4060-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3030--
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%3860-22-3.3
Human Oversight Design12%4560-15-1.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%2540-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%4862-14-1.1
Total100%35 (F)49 (F)-14-13.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAon AssessmentOracle Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Audit reportSources on a separate domain12
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%116Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain134Sources on the vendor's own domain

Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Aon Assessment last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.