§ The result
1 point separates Turing and Aon Assessment.
Within the Assessment cohort, Turing edges Aon Assessment by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 36 to 35. Turing leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Aon Assessment leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 3 are level. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Aon Assessment 38, Turing 44 — and at a 15% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage Turing holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Aon Assessment and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Turing 44
0.9 weighted points to Turing
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Turing 42
0.4 weighted points to Turing
18% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Turing 28
0.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Turing 27
0.2 weighted points to Turing
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 1.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 44 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 45 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 48 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 36 (F) | -1 | -1.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next