§ The result
4 points separate Beamery and Apriora (Alex).
Beamery (Sourcing) edges Apriora (Alex) (Video interview) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) to 57 (F). Beamery leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Apriora (Alex) leads 3, including FRIA Support. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Apriora (Alex) 52, Beamery 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Apriora (Alex)
Apriora's product "Alex" is an agentic AI recruiter whose live voice/video interviewer conducts real-time conversational interviews with candidates, asks dynamic follow-ups, and returns role-fit scores, transcripts, and fraud flags to the hiring team.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
§ The record
Apriora (Alex) is filed under Video interview AI, Beamery under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Apriora (Alex) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Apriora (Alex) | Beamery |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2023 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Apriora (Alex) 52 · Beamery 70
3.6 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Apriora (Alex) 47 · Beamery 60
1.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Apriora (Alex) 38 · Beamery 30
1.2 weighted points to Apriora (Alex)
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Apriora (Alex) 54 · Beamery 60
0.9 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Apriora (Alex) 60 · Beamery 55
0.6 weighted points to Apriora (Alex)
18% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Apriora (Alex) 83 · Beamery 85
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Apriora (Alex) 62 · Beamery 60
0.2 weighted points to Apriora (Alex)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Apriora (Alex) minus Beamery.
| Category | Weight | Apriora (Alex) | Beamery | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 70 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 85 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 60 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 60 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 61 (D) | -4 | -4.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Apriora (Alex) | Beamery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Apriora (Alex) has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Apriora (Alex) and Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Apriora (Alex), across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Apriora (Alex) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next