Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Radancy
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Radancy
Radancy is an enterprise talent acquisition cloud combining recruitment marketing, career sites and CRM with agentic AI that sources, screens, scores, ranks and schedules candidates, including one-way video screening inherited from its myInterview acquisition.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Radancy.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Radancy | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 42 | +8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 20 | +15 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 28 | +7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 58 | -1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 57 | -1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 60 | +4 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 41 (F) | +5 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Radancy
22 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 1
- integration
- 1