§ The result
Beamery leads Arya by Leoforce on all 7 criteria.
The Sourcing cohort pairing of Beamery and Arya by Leoforce comes out 61 (D) to 38 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 23-point lead for Beamery. Arya by Leoforce leads none of the 7 criteria, and Beamery is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Arya by Leoforce 40, Beamery 85, 18% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Beamery builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce and Beamery are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Arya by Leoforce is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | Beamery |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · Beamery 85
8.1 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Beamery 70
8.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Beamery 60
3.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · Beamery 60
1.8 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · Beamery 60
1.1 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · Beamery 30
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · Beamery 55
0.1 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -23.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -23.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Beamery.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Beamery | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 85 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 60 | -30 | -3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 60 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 61 (D) | -23 | -23.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Beamery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next