§ The result
3 points separate Arya by Leoforce and Ceipal.
Arya by Leoforce (Sourcing) edges Ceipal (ATS-integrated) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 38 to 35. Arya by Leoforce leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Ceipal leads 2, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 2 are level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Arya by Leoforce 40, Ceipal 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 74% of the weighted advantage Arya by Leoforce holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Ceipal under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Arya by Leoforce is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | Ceipal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · Ceipal 20
3.6 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · Ceipal 46
1.0 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Ceipal 38
1.0 weighted points to Ceipal
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · Ceipal 53
0.6 weighted points to Ceipal
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · Ceipal 46
0.3 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +3.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Ceipal.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Ceipal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 20 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 46 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 46 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 53 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 35 (F) | +3 | +3.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Ceipal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Ceipal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next