§ The result
CodeSignal leads Arya by Leoforce on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, CodeSignal, filed under Assessment, finishes on 43 and Arya by Leoforce, filed under Sourcing, on 38, 5 points apart. Arya by Leoforce is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: CodeSignal takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Human Oversight Design, Arya by Leoforce 54 to CodeSignal 55. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Arya by Leoforce 46, CodeSignal 62) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Arya by Leoforce 30, CodeSignal 38), the second being 31% of the weighted advantage CodeSignal holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
CodeSignal
CodeSignal is a technical skills assessment and interview platform for developer hiring that adds AI features including an AI Interviewer, AI-assisted/agentic coding assessments, and AI-plus-human proctoring.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, CodeSignal under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only CodeSignal is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | CodeSignal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · CodeSignal 38
1.6 weighted points to CodeSignal
8% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · CodeSignal 62
1.3 weighted points to CodeSignal
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · CodeSignal 38
1.0 weighted points to CodeSignal
18% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · CodeSignal 45
0.9 weighted points to CodeSignal
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · CodeSignal 50
0.3 weighted points to CodeSignal
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · CodeSignal 55
0.1 weighted points to CodeSignal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -5.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus CodeSignal.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | CodeSignal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 62 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 43 (F) | -5 | -5.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | CodeSignal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; CodeSignal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for CodeSignal, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- CodeSignal last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next