§ The result
Cornerstone OnDemand leads Arya by Leoforce on all 7 criteria.
Cornerstone OnDemand finishes 18 points clear of Arya by Leoforce under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 38 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Cornerstone OnDemand leads every one of the 7 criteria, Arya by Leoforce none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Arya by Leoforce 54 to Cornerstone OnDemand 55. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Arya by Leoforce 30, Cornerstone OnDemand 72) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
Cornerstone OnDemand
Cornerstone OnDemand is an enterprise talent-management and learning suite whose Cornerstone Galaxy platform uses AI-driven skills extraction and matching (including the acquired SkyHive Skills Models) to power recruiting, candidate screening, and workforce development.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Cornerstone OnDemand under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Cornerstone OnDemand is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | Cornerstone OnDemand |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 1999 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Cornerstone OnDemand 72
8.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · Cornerstone OnDemand 58
3.2 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · Cornerstone OnDemand 60
1.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Cornerstone OnDemand 45
1.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · Cornerstone OnDemand 35
1.5 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · Cornerstone OnDemand 60
1.1 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · Cornerstone OnDemand 55
0.1 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Cornerstone OnDemand.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Cornerstone OnDemand | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 72 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 60 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 56 (F) | -18 | -18.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Cornerstone OnDemand | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.