HomeCompareArya by Leoforce vs Pymetrics (Harver Games)

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Arya by Leoforce vs Pymetrics (Harver Games)

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads Arya by Leoforce by 18 points.

Pymetrics (Harver Games) finishes 18 points clear of Arya by Leoforce under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 38 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Arya by Leoforce takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 5 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Arya by Leoforce 30, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordArya by LeoforcePymetrics (Harver Games)
Price tierHighEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20122013

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Arya by Leoforce 30 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70

    8.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  2. 18% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Arya by Leoforce 40 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80

    7.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  3. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Arya by Leoforce 48 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60

    1.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  4. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Arya by Leoforce 46 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55

    0.7 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Arya by Leoforce 30 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35

    0.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Arya by Leoforce 54 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50

    0.5 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -17.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).

CategoryWeightArya by LeoforcePymetrics (Harver Games)Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3070-40-8.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4080-40-7.2
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4860-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5450+4+0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3035-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%4655-9-0.7
Total100%38 (F)56 (F)-18-17.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightArya by LeoforcePymetrics (Harver Games)
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%32Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%265Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain92Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.